Systematische zoekstrategie

List of more or less randomly selected websites:

• Systematic Review Search Support pages (Janneke Staaks, UvA) on the Open Science Framework(incl Child and Mental Health filter).
• Search Archive to share your search strategy and get a doi for your search
• Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
• PRISMA Statement
• LibGuides UU
• LibGuide Kings College
• Website of the University of York with all their systematic reviews on health care
• Consultation Methods & Statistics UU FSS. The Methods & Statistics (M&S) department offers advice to students and researchers from the faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, who have questions about their research

Filters:

• ISSG: https://sites.google.com/a/york.ac.uk/issg-search-filters-resource/home/rcts,
• ISSG filters added in 2021
• The Search Filter resource also includes literature on the performance of filters. The latest review added is Boulos et al. (2021) Search methods for prognostic factor systematic reviews: a methodologic investigation.
• Cochrane RCT filters for PubMed
• BMI search blocks: https://blocks.bmi-online.nl/

For reading:

McKeown Sandra and Zuhaib M. Mir. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: A follow-up study to evaluate the performance of various automated methods for reference de-duplication. In: Research Synthesis Methods, 25 July 2024, p.1-9. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1736

This article discusses ten tools for deduplication: EndNote systems (Desktop X9, EndNote Desktop 20 and EndNote online classic), Mendeley, RefWorks, Zotero, ASySD (Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator), Covidence, Deduklick, DistillerSR, Rayyan and SRA Deduplicator. Advice: always stay in control and be accountable for your systematic reviews (item 16 PRISMA-Statement)

Bramer, W.M. (2019, October 29). Serving Evidence Syntheses: Improving literature retrieval in systematic reviews. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Dissertation. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1765/120107

Wichor M. Bramer, Gerdien B. de Jonge, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, AHIP, Frans Mast, Jos Kleijnen. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct; 106(4): 531–541. Published online 2018 Oct 1. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283. Retrieved 8 Oct 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/

Bramer, W.M., Giustini, D., Kramer, B.M. et al. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews (2013) 2: 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-115

Michael Gusenbauer, Neal R. Haddaway. (2019). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods. First published:15 October 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Hannah Harrison , Simon J. Griffin, Isla Kuhn and Juliet A. Usher-Smith. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2020) 20:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3

Mark Petticrew, Helen Roberts. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences : a practical guide Available for UU at: https://utrechtuniversity.on.worldcat.org/oclc/60360309

Andrew Booth, Anthea Sutton and Diana Papaioannou. (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, (requested via the authors)

Andrew Booth , Fifty shades of review, Nov 2016, webinar, https://eahilcpd.wordpress.com/webinar-toolkit/webinar-toolkit-fifty-shades-of-review-with-andrew-booth/

Chris Cooper, Andrew Booth, Jo Varley-Campbell, Nicky Britten and Ruth Garside. Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018 18:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3

Maria J. Grant Andrew Booth (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Information and Libraries Journal, Volume 26, Issue2, June 2009, pp. 91-108. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Verberne, Lisa M; Zwakman, Marieke; Kars, Marijke C; Hooft, Lotty; van Delden, Johannes J M; Spijker, René. (2018) Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care. BMC Palliative care, volume 17, issue 1, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/364626 cc-by 4.0

Paul Fontelo, Fang Liu. A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries Systematic Reviews 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1 https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1

Suggestion: Boland, A., Cherry, M.G., & Dickson, R. (2014). Doing a systematic review. London: Sage How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology Vol. 70:747-770 (Volume publication date January 2019) First published as a Review in Advance on August 8, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803