Search in steps with OR and AND |
Additional operators: Phrases and Truncations |
How to... in PubMed |
How to ... in CAB Abstracts |
||||||||||||||
1. Choose one element in one (sub-)question of your Search Profile, and perform one or several 'OR' searches for this single element 2. Cluster (if not yet performed in Step1) the Results of all 'OR' searches for this element; this means that all publications will be found in which at least one of the used terms occur. Example: horse OR equine OR equus 3. Repeat Step 1 and 2 for the other elements in the question 4. Combine the Results of the clustered 'OR'-searches
Use the available tools! Do not type the operators yourself, but make use from OR, AND or NOT in the ADVANCED SEARCH options and the SEARCH HISTORY
|
When you perform the 'OR'-searches, you can also use specific operators:
For example:
Be aware of the pitfalls!
|
Search with Automatic Term Mapping
1. Start with typing ONE term from your Search Profile (you may use another, pre-suggested term, if applicable) See in the right hand column the 'Search details' how PubMed has used the given terms:
Do you observe new terms? Add them to your profile! 2. Repeat the above Step-1 with other terms for the same element in your profile, if these were not yet used by PubMed in Step-1. 3. Cluster the separate Search Results for this Element with 'OR'
4. Repeat Steps-1-2-3 with all other elements of your question 5. Combine the clustered Search Results of two or more elements
|
Search Advanced with Keywords:
1. Choose [Advanced Search] on the homepage of the (Ovid-)platform
2. Repeat this term mapping with other terms for the same element in your profile, if these were not yet mentioned in 'Used for'
3. Cluster all separate Search Results for the respective element with OR
4. Repeat Steps-1-2-3 with all other elements of your question 5. Combine the clustered Search Results of two or more elements.
|
AFTER YOUR SEARCH, you will probably see a (long) list of records Resist the temptation to start reading articles immediately!
|
Criteria for selection |
How to determine the RELEVANCY |
How to determine the RELIABILITY |
How to determine the EVIDENTIAL VALUE |
||||||||||||||||
In most cases, you will find too many sources. Which of them will you use? Make your choice on the basis of: RELEVANCY for your question. RELIABILITY of the sources. These should be beyond doubt, otherwise your paper itself might be doubted! EVIDENTIAL VALUE This may differ widely with the type of study. |
Is a certain source RELEVANT for your specific subject? Try to answer the following questions:
|
How RELIABLE is a source? Judge the article with the following questions:
|
Is the described result CONVINCING? You may look at the type of publication. Where is it in the pyramid of evidence?
The 'evidential value' of a publication is determined by the type of research that underlies it. Meta-analyzes and well-executed Systematic Reviews have the highest evidential value. Critically Appraised Topics are similar in structure to Systematic Reviews, but less extensive; provided that it is carried out carefully, the evidential value is strong here too. |