Determine for the sources you have found whether they are relevant to your topic and whether they are scientific/reliable (note, not all your sources always have to be academic, sometimes you can also use reports or documents from government institutions.
How do you determine whether an item is suitable for you to use?
Would you like to know more about relevance and scientific reliability? Then take a look at the boxes below and our LibGuide on evaluating sources.
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competences as the producers of the work (peers). It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication.
source: Wikipedia
See also this video below:
Library NCSU. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license
You often cannot see in the article itself whether an article has been peer-reviewed or not. But how do you find out?
You can use the tips below:
To determine if a source is relevant, you may try to answer the following questions:
Think that you will rarely find a source that provides a complete answer to your main questions and sub-questions and that gives a report of the exact same research or problem you are working on.
Want to read the full text: the UBU-link will give you access to publications from the online collection of the Utrecht University Library.
Visit the LibGuide Evaluting sources for more information.
The crux of science lies in the extent to which an author/researcher performs his work objectively and makes it verifiable. In determining the quality and scientific nature of sources you may start from three kinds of checks:
The CRAPMAP consists of a list of questions that help you to assess whether the (online) information you have found is reliable and useful. Depending on your situation, items from the list are more or less important. NB! Always stay alert! This checklist is just a tool and not always sufficient.
Currency
The timeliness of the information
When was the information published or posted?
Has the information been revised or updated? Or perhaps even retracted?
Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work as well?
Relevance
The importance of the information for your needs
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your questions?
Who is the intended audience?
Is the information at an appropriate level (not too simple or too advanced)
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?
Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?
Accuracy
The reliability, truthfulness and correctness of the content
Where does the information come from?
Is the information supported by evidence?
Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?
Are there spelling, grammar or typographical errors? [Second task or achievement]
Publication
The source of the information
Who is the author/publisher/source/journal/sponsor?
What are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations?
Is the author qualified to write on the topic?
Is the publisher/journal scientific? Are they reputable?
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
Metrics*
The impact a source has on the scientific field
Are you able to find metrics for the source?
Is the source cited by current research?
Altmetrics*
The impact a source has in general
Are you able to find altmetrics for the source?
Is your research impacted by how well the source is received?
What does the public reception of a source indicate?
* For information about metrics and altmetrics see the LibGuide Research Impact & visibility: traditional and altmetrics
Purpose
The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? Is it to inform, teach, sell, entertain or persuade?
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
Is the information fact, opinion or propaganda?
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Is there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, financial or personal bias?
This checklist is based on the CRA(A)P test, originally developed by the library of the California State University, Chico